← All work Case study · Brand side
Seat 2 · Brand side · Purplle.com, India's beauty unicorn

Building an acquisition system that held at 4x sale-day budgets

Assistant Manager, Digital MarketingOct 2020 – Sep 20223 min read
4xdaily budget on sale days, zero learning resets
−35%acquisition cost across three major sales
$18M+a year in paid media, reporting to CXOs
02 · The situation

Sales broke the algorithm exactly when the business needed it most

CompanyPurplle.com, 500+ brands, 70,000+ products
My roleOwned paid media strategy
Team2 agency partners and ROI Hunter
Reported toCXOs, monthly

App installs, first purchases on app and web, and retention all ran inside shared accounts. When budgets surged for a major sale, three competing objectives sent mixed signals into the algorithm at once. It couldn’t tell a loyal customer from a new one, so it chased the easiest conversion. Learning reset, and days of optimization were lost exactly when the business needed performance.

Finding 1Paid wasn’t driving repeat purchase

About 70% of repeat buyers bought again within 30 days because of the sales calendar. Beyond that, most came back through organic and direct. Paid had to focus on first purchases.

Finding 2Separation had to happen at account level

Meta’s algorithm learns from the whole account’s history, so splitting objectives by campaign inside one account still blended the signals.

03 · The call

A sale is six weeks away. What do you change?

Make your call to see mine.

04 · What I built

Four accounts, each learning one thing

Step 1 · Before

One shared account, four objectives

Installs, first purchases and retention competed for the same learning. On sale days, the signals tangled.

Step 2 · The split

Four accounts, no audience overlap

Each account learned one objective. Existing high-intent buyers were excluded from acquisition.

Step 3 · Sale day

Acquisition scales to 4x a normal day

The three acquisition accounts could take four times their daily budget during sales without resetting. Retention stayed steady by design.

Step 4 · The feed

A leaner product feed

With ROI Hunter, about 40% of products came out of acquisition: unprofitable items, high-traffic items that never sold, and low-margin brands. Conversion rate rose about 20%.

Exhibit · step 1 of 4
One shared account splitting into four, acquisition accounts scaling on sale days, and a trimmed product feed App installinstalls only First purchase · appnew buyers only First purchase · webnew buyers only One shared account4 objectives, 1 signal Retentionrepeat buyers only sale-day budget 4x on the three acquisition accounts · retention unchanged product feed ~40% removed from acquisition · conversion rate +20%
Now showingOne shared account, four objectives
05 · What happened

The structure held where it used to break

4xdaily budget on sale days, zero learning resets
−35%acquisition cost while sale budget grew about 3x
2xfirst-time transactions during sales; 3–4x total
  • One I Heart Beauty sale delivered 3x sales, 2x profit and 105% more new users than comparable past sales.
  • In daily data, the old single-account setup had started to break at about 2x budget. Recovery after volatile periods fell from 2–3 weeks to 2–3 days.
  • The same structure carried seven in-house brand launches, each measured separately.
  • Recognized with Purplle’s Superstar award (April 2021) and a 2021 MCube Awards nomination.
06 · What I'd change

I’d automate reporting from day one

Four accounts made the monthly CXO reviews heavy to build by hand. That time would have been better spent on analysis.

Separate intent before you optimize for efficiency. Scale doesn’t break good structures; it exposes weak ones.

Scaling without breaking · E-commerce · Beauty · India · Meta, Google, app installs

Hiring for a role like this?astitvasawhney@gmail.comMore ways to reach me